The purpose of this study was to discover the experience of hemodialysis which clients confronted hemodialysis at the time as CRF diagnosis and to understand the nature and meaning of their crisis experience.
The research subjects were 6 clients receiving hemodialysis in Seoul from Jan. 1996 to Jul, 1996. Data were collected by informal indepth interview and participant observation.
Content Analysis(by Seaman & Verhonick, 1982: Woods & Catanzaro, 1988) was applied to collect similar contents and common experience in order to derivate concepts and categories for better understanding of their hemodialysis experience.
As a result, 6 categories derivated to indentify their hemodialysis experience of the CRF clients-confronted hemodialysis at the same time as CRF diagnosis-were as follows:
1) The category of shocking crisis composed the concepts of shock, amagement and suffocation.
2) The category of denial composed the concepts of disease refusal and hemodialysis refusal.
They repeatedly visited hospitals or didn't visit hospital in order to refuse disease, then depended on folk remedy or shamanistic method.
3) The category of severe anxiety composed the concepts of abandoned feeling, shame, resentment, neurosis and anger.
4) The category of depression composed the concepts of grief, suffering of unfairness, tearing, desire to death.
5) The category of powerlessness composed the concept of hopelessness.
6) The category of reigned acceptance composed the concepts of resignation and acceptance.
In this study, the CRF clients who confronted hemodialysis at the same time as CRF diagnosis experienced six stages in accepting hemodialysis but these stages were mingled simultaneously and went on.
|